Meeting documents

SCC Constitution and Governance Committee
Monday, 12th September, 2022 2.00 pm

  • Meeting of Constitution and Governance Committee, Monday 12th September 2022 2.00 pm (Item 5.)

To consider report

Minutes:

The Committee considered a report from the Council’s Monitoring Officer and Strategic Manager – Governance and Democratic Services, Scott Wooldridge, which outlined the approach and options to developing the proposed new Constitution for the new Somerset Council.

 

The following points were highlighted:

  • The Council’s AGM in May 2022 agreed an interim Constitution for 2022/23, recognising there needed to be a comprehensive review of the Constitution during 2022/23, resulting in the proposed Constitution for the new Somerset Council being recommended to the County Council meeting in February 2023 ahead of vesting day (on 1 April 2023)
  • The work of this Committee to develop  the Constitution for the new Somerset Council
  • Would look at best practice from other Councils and review the Constitutions of recent LGRs
  • The principles, approach and options to developing the proposed new Constitution as set out in paragraph 3.5 of the Report: -
    • ‘Option 1’ - expand / build upon the existing SCC Constitution; ‘
    • ‘Option 2’ - develop a completely new Constitution with reference to best practice / relevant peer councils and this was the preferred option
  • Structure of a new Constitution, as set out in paragraph 3.6 of the Report
  • Highlighted the resources needed for both options, in particular Option 2.

 

Members of the Committee discussed the report and points raised included – where the proposed LCN’s would fit in the new Constitution; what ‘proportionate’ meant; the ‘added value’ of Option 2; the significant amount of work in developing new Constitution; whether Option 1 would be pragmatically the best solution due to scale of work involved and new Chief Executive starting in post soon; comment made that the Constitution was a ‘living’ document and should be under constant review and amendment.

 

In response to the points raised, Mr Wooldridge said: -

  • ‘proportionate’ and the advantages of Option 2 (the ‘added value’ of this option) and referred to paragraph 3.4 of the report which meant ‘proportionate’ in its design, and an example of this was to have more in it describing Full Council than some other Committees
  • referred to the timeline of work set out in paragraph 3.7 and the meeting in January would be making its overall recommendations to the Full Council meeting in February 2023, to include proposals relating to the democratic arrangements to operate from 1 April 2023;
  • there would also be a committee such as this one, which would review and keep the Constitution up to date and a standing provision within the Constitution for an annual review to take place at the Full Council AGM each year;
  • explained that essentially option 1 would be focussing on the ‘bolt-ons’ (the District Council functions such as licensing and so on) whilst option 2 would be looking at best practice / learn from other areas and work in a more structured basis in terms of looking at the functions of a unitary Council and then building the Constitution accordingly;
  • highlighted the additional benefits from option 2, in terms of the committee informing what it saw as those key organisational messages to go forward as part of the Constitution;
  • both options would take time and required dedicated level of resource and flagged that Option 2 would require the council to draw upon potentially its external legal advisers to assist as well;
  • stressed that option 2 would require the leadership and sole focus of the Monitoring Officer for its delivery and other resources to deliver (around reprioritisation of legal and democratic work);
  • LCN’s, Licensing / Planning functions would be in Part D (Committee arrangements) in the new Constitution;
  • referred the Scheme of Delegation to officers and mentioned that work with District colleagues was ongoing to inform what was defined in the draft Constitution;
  • referenced the role of other bodies / the Executive in working up the draft Constitution;
  • referred to aspects of the current Constitution which would not want to lose going forward.

 

The Committee AGREED: -

 

1.    To endorse the proposed phased approach to developing the Constitution for the new Somerset Council set out in the Report; and

2.    That the approach to developing the Constitution for the new Somerset Council, is to develop a completely new Constitution for the new Somerset Council, with reference to best practice from Councils who have recently undertaken Local Government Reorganisation and other relevant peer Councils, (referred to as Option 2), as set out in paragraphs 3.5 and 3.6 of the Report.

 

Supporting documents: